Updated 09/20/99

 HOME                                   http://www.intertwining.org/dissertation

Hypertext
Dissertation

Frontmatter
Abstract

Chapter One

Phase One
Toward an Objective Reality of the Collaboratory
Chapter Two
Chapter Three
Chapter Four
Chapter Five
Conclusion

Phase Two
Toward a Subjective Reality of the Collaboratory
Chapter Six
Chapter Seven
Chapter Eight

Conclusion

Phase Three
Toward an Intersubjective Reality of the Collaboratory
Chapter Nine
Conclusion

Conclusion of
the Study

References

Appendices
A. Retrieval Set
B. CIRAL Matrix
C. Participating
Collaboratories

BS00621A.gif (3644 bytes)

Guest Book

Dissertation
Committee

.pdf Document
Traditional dissertation format suitable for print. Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader.

(281 pages, 1.1MB)

Powerpoint Presentation
(1.MB 103 slides)

List of
Hyperlinks from
the text of the
study

Taxonomies

 

A Naturalistic Inquiry into the Collaboratory:
In Search Of Understanding
For Prospective Participants

Copyright ã joanne twining, 1999
All Rights Reserved

PREFACE TO WEB VERSION

Hi.   This website presents my dissertation work, an exploration of the emerging information environment of the collaboratory, or laboratory without walls.   This study is intended to support expansive research, so instead of using one tool to dig one deep hole, it uses many tools to dig several shallower holes to map the new terrain.  

While this study is about the collaboratory, it is also about the way we make knowledge.  Its primary pupose to to provide a pimer about the collaboratory; its underlying  purpose is to lay the foundation for continued work on the emerging "intertwining model" of knowledge construction, or how we create knowledge in the objective, subjective, and intersubjective, and specifically how me might create it differently as they merge in cyber-facilitated simultaniety.  It also plants the seeds for an experimental interdisciplinary classification scheme based on the taxonomies developed in Phase One.

wpe1.jpg (25940 bytes)

The dissertation was submitted in tradititonal paper format as required, to be forever bound and shelved in the stacks of the library, frozen in time and forever unlinked to its future.  It is available here in that traditional (paper) format as a .pdf document from the column of options to the left, via the .pdf Document hyperlink.  The website also presents the hypertext version, as clickable chapters, and continues the journey...

A dissertation is the "final" assignment for the "terminal" degree of Doctor of Philosophy, and is intended not only to make an original contribution to the body of knowledge, but to provide the student an opportunity to exercise the research and inquiry skills learned during doctoral coursework while still under the careful scrutiny and guidance of those who have completed the task.  The dissertation is the final requirement before being granted peer consent to join in the practice of the philosophy of the discipline of study. 

I successfully defended this dissertation to my dissertation committee on 9/16/99, and that day "became" Dr. joanne twining, or joanne twining, Ph.D., Doctor of Philosophy of Library and Information Studies.

I chose library information studies as my discipline because it is an interdiscipline, and  I thought it would be the hardest subject to master since it's about everything and anything, and specifically about how people come to know.  I was right.

I chose the collaboratory as the topic for my dissertation for several reasons.  Primary among them is that it is an elegant word that was delivered to me by the goddess of electronic nuggets, and I always listen to her.  The word collaboratory slips off the tongue and sounds as if someone just made it up.  Most people chuckle the first time they hear it, convinced it's some sort of cyberfad.  It isn't.  It's big science.  Very big.  And someone indeed just made up the word, and by doing so, I'm convinced, changed forever the way scence will be done. 

But when the goddess of  electronic nuggests delivered me the word and I went to the library find out more about it, I didn't find what I was looking for.  

So I had to write it myself.

Now, when someone goes looking for information about the collaboratory, and when scientists have to learn about how to conduct virtual, shared science, and educators have to start teaching it, and librarians have to start supporting that work, they can all turn to this document for understanding.  In that sense, it is an original contribution to the body of knowledge.

But a dissertation is more than that.

It's about the process as much as the product.

I approached the task intending to find the limits of my ability to know things, and was fully prepared and intended to come to the edge of that ability so I never  had to wonder where it was again.

I didn't find it.

What I found was a beginning.

I hope you enjoy  the story of my journey of discovery about the collaboratory and will look closely between the words at the process of my thinking and can catch a glimpse of the "intertwining model."

I hope you'll drop me a line to let me know what you think, or better yet, leave a mesage in the Guest Book and let's start building knowledge together.

joanne twining, M.L.S., Ph.D.
twining@intertwining.org

 Dissertation Frontmatter ->
Abstract -
>

Citation
twining, joanne. 1999. A naturalistic inquiry into the collaboratory: In search of understanding for prospective participants. Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas Woman's University School of Library and Information Studies.   http://www.intertwining.org/dissertation

Placed January 1999
Email reseacher: twining@intertwining.org
Dissertation web: http://www.intertwining.org/dissertation

-30-